By A. Phillips Griffiths
A. J. Ayer, who died in 1989, used to be said as certainly one of Britain's so much distinct philosophers. during this memorial number of essays prime Western philosophers give some thought to Ayer's position within the heritage of philosophy and discover facets of his inspiration and instructing. the quantity additionally incorporates a posthumous essay by way of Ayer himself: "A Defence of Empiricism." those essays are definitely a becoming tribute to a tremendous determine, however the assortment isn't easily retrospective; relatively it appears ahead to offer and destiny advancements in philosophical inspiration that Ayer's paintings has influenced.
Read or Download A. J. Ayer: Memorial Essays (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements (No. 30)) PDF
Similar essays books
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, bestselling writer, and Wheel of Fortune contestant Dave Barry exposes the shattering fact. even if he's splashing with the U. S. sychronized swim staff ("Picture a number of stylish swans swimming with a flailing sea cow") or reliving the Pilgrims' first Thanksgiving ("We've determined to obliterate your tradition, yet first may possibly we strive the stuffing?
The matter the Pirate celebration faces, and obviously, each 3rd occasion, is “Who are they? What do they stand for? Why may still I vote for them? ” This publication seeks to assist alleviate that challenge. in this case we now have written a chain of essays regarding our basic platform. We determined to do that for a number of purposes.
There aren't many of us who may be stated to have prompted and inspired researchers in such a lot of disparate parts and language-geographic fields as Lauri Carlson, as is evidenced within the current Festschrift. His perception and acute linguistic sensitivity and linguistic rationality have spawned findings and examine paintings in lots of parts, from non-standard etymology to hardcore formal linguistics, no longer forgetting computational components resembling parsing, terminological databases, and, final yet now not least, computing device translation.
The writer of various earlier books of huge attraction and scholarly acclaim on topics starting from sociological thought to spiritual ethics in govt and fiscal platforms, and the coauthor of a tremendously influential treatise at the Social building of truth, Berger unfolds in Redeeming Laughter a brand new viewpoint on a vintage area.
- Essays in Labour History: In memory of G. D. H. Cole 25 September 1889–14 January 1959
- The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation
- All Art Is Propaganda
- Burn This Book: PEN Writers Speak Out on the Power of the Word
- The Full Spectrum: A New Generation of Writing About Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, and Other Identities
- Imperial Defence: The Old World Order, 1856-1956
Extra info for A. J. Ayer: Memorial Essays (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements (No. 30))
In 1934 in 'Uber das Fundament der Erkenntnis', Schlick effectively criticized that position. Although Ayer agreed with Schlick that basic statements are to be verified by the experiences to which they demonstratively refer, he denied that they are absolutely certain and incorrigible. His reason was 'that a sentence cannot merely name a situation, it must say something about it. And in describing a situation one is not merely "registering" a sense-content: one is classifying it in some way or other, and this means going beyond what is immediately given'.
The Cook Wilsonians had turned their antiquated artillery on to what they saw as the even worse errors of the Cambridge philosophers, who had done so much more than they had to undermine it. Prichard had vehemently criticized Russell's theory of knowledge in an article in Mind in 1915 and he and Joseph were persistently hostile to Russell's logic. Moore, as an ethical consequentialist, was one of those who, in Prichard's view, had committed a fundamental mistake in moral philosophy. The only book Prichard published in his lifetime, Kant's Theory ofKnowledge had come out in 1909: Joseph's main work, his Introduction to Logic as long ago as 1916.
His philosophical logic derives from Russell and the Tractatus, his philosophy of mind from intimations that had come to him of the thinking of the later Wittgenstein. But he put his own stamp very markedly on what he took. That is in part a matter of his breezy, epigrammatic, resolutely non-technical style. That style was in tune with a mode of proceeding that relied heavily on analogy and, in general, avoided the laborious protection of theses from all possible objections. Oddly, in the light of their respective ways of life—collegiate in Ryle's case, metropolitan in Ayer's, it is Ryle who is the less academically respectable and conformist.